"...Back-radiating trace gases cannot make the earth's surface warmer than solar energy makes it."
Tim Ball, "Slaying the Sky Dragon." 2011, p5.
The Climate Change Narrative
The science of climate change has been hijacked by politicians who use climate-change fearmongering to control the electorate and
its corporations. Their tactics involve the vilification of the carbon dioxide
("CO2") generated by the consumption of hydrocarbon fuels
(aka "fossil fuels"),
which are required to maintain a modern standard of living. Climate change started out as global warming but the name
had to change because global warming ended in 1998.
The political drive to reduce society's CO2
(aka "carbon") footprint is based on the CO2-induced, global warming hoax.
CO2 is plant food; that is, it is a substance of life as a vital component of the carbon cycle and photosynthesis.
Photosynthesis, a biological process, 'greens' the planet.
Climate alarmists live in the delusional computer world of fake climate models, where anything is possible using the modern 'pixie dust', CO2; including,
but not limited to, global warming, global cooling, droughts, famines, floods, rising seas, earthquakes, hurricanes,
forest fires, etc., etc., etc. I wonder how they
explain the six warm periods, and intervening cold periods, since the end of last glaciation period 10,000 years ago -
the Wisconsin Glaciation Period.
It is well established that global cooling has been the greatest climate threat
to civilizations (eg. The Little Ice Age 1300-1850).
Even greater climate threats are the cyclic glaciations every 100,000 years when Canada is covered by a mile of ice. Canada has been covered more than twenty-three
times during the last 2.67 million years of the current Holarctic-Antarctic Ice Age. We are now approaching the end of an intervening warm period called the
Holocene Interglacial. This glaciation period shouldn't be confused with the new Little Ice Age, which we are now entering.
Hopefully, it is not the successor to the Wisconsin Glaciation Period!
The alarmist, climate-change narrative seems to ignore simple harmonic motion (natural climate variability) and claims that man can overcome
the force of nature with
CO2. It is delusional to believe that restricting the generation of CO2 will stabilize the planet's climate.
Man cannot control Mother Nature in so many aspects, so why it is assumed man can control or materially influence climate?
The mighty dollar seems to have an influence in the creation of computer models which
cannot even predict what has happened not
to mention what is going to happen.
"Ninety-five per cent of the computer models agree that the observations must be wrong," says
Dr. Roy Spencer.